-
Arnold, James. “Césaire and
Shakespeare: Two Tempests”, Comparative Literature, 40 (1978),
236–48.
-
Baker, David J., “Where is Ireland in
The Tempest?” in Shakespeare and
Ireland: History, Politics, Culture, 1997,
pp. 68–77 eds. Burnett, Thornton & Wray,
Romana.
-
Barker, Francis, and Peter Hulme.
“Nymphs and reapers heavily vanish: the discursive
con-texts of the
Tempest, in John Drakakis, ed., Alternative Shakespeare, 1985,
pp. 191–205.
-
Bennett, Susan, Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the
Contemporary Past,
1996.
-
Berger, Jr. Harry, “Mircaculous harp: a
reading of Shakespeare’s Tempest”, S. St., 5 (1969),
253–83.
-
Berger, Karol, “Prospero’s Art”, S.
St., 10 (1977), 211–39.
-
Bloom, Harold, “The Tempest”, in
Shakespeare and The Invention of
the Human”, New York, 1998, pp.
662–684.
-
Booth, Mark W, The Experience of Songs,
1981.
-
Brathwaite, Edward Kamau, The Colonial Encounter:
Language, 1984.
-
Brown, Paul, “This Thing of Darkness: I
Acknowledge Mine”: The
Tempest and the discourse of Colonialism”, in
Political Shakespeare: Essay in
Cultural Materialism, Ichoca and London,
1994.
-
Bulman, James C, Shakespeare, Theory and
Performance, 1996, pp.
187–209.
-
Cartelli, Thomas, Repositationing Shakespeare: National
Formations, Postcoloinal
Appropriations, 1999.
-
Chew, Shirley and Stead, Alistair eds.
Translation Life: Studies in
Transpositional
Aesthetics, 1999, pp.
99–121.
-
Chickering, Howell, “Heating Ariel’s
Songs”, Journal of Medieval and
Reniassance Studies
(1994), 131–72.
-
Cholij, Irena, “A thousand twangling
instruments”: Music and The
Tempest on the eighteenth Century London
Stage’, S. Sur., 51
(1998), 79–94.
-
Cressy, David, Travesties and Transgressions in Tudor and Stuart
England, 2000, ch. 3.
-
Debus, Allen G, Man and Nature in the Renaissance,
1978.
-
D’haen, Theo. & Bertens, Hams,
eds., Liminal
Postmodernisms, 1994, pp.
115–38.
-
Dryden, John. & Davenant,
William, The Enchanted
Island, in Sandra Clark, ed. Shakespeare Made Fit,
1997.
-
Gillies, John, “ Shakespeare’s
Virginian masque”, ELH, 53 (1986),
673–707.
-
Gillies, John, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference,
1994.
-
Graff, Gerald and James Phelan, eds.
“The Tempest”: A Case Study in
Critical Controversy,
2000.
-
Greenblatt, Stephen, Learning to Curse, 1990, pp.
16–39.
-
Hamilton, B. & Strier, Richard,
Religion, Literature and
Politics in Post-Reformation England,
1554–1688, 1996.
-
Hirst, David L, The Tempest: Text and Performance,
1984.
-
Holland, Peter, English Shakespeare, 1997, p.
172.
-
Holland, Peter, “Modernizing
Shakespeare: Nicholas Rowe and The Tempest”, S.
Q., Vol. 51, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp.
24–32.
-
Hulme, Peter, Colonial Encounters,
1986.
-
Hulme, Peter & William H.
Sherman, eds., “The Tempest” and
its Travels, 2000.
-
Hunter, Robert, Shakespeare and the Comedy of Forgiveness,
1965.
-
Jonson & Clayton, Margaret
Tudeau, Shakespeare and Early
Modern Virgil, 1998.
-
Kahn, Coppélia “The Providential
Tempest and the Shakespearean Family”, in Murray M.
Schwartz and Coppélia Kahn eds., Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic
Essays, 1980, pp.
217–43.
-
Kinney, Arthur F., “Revisiting
The Tempest”,
Modern Philology, 93
(1995/6), 161–77.
-
Lea, K. M.,
Italian Popular Comedy, 2 vols., 1934, II,
pp. 443–53.
-
Lenz, Carolyn et al., eds., The Woman’s Part, 1980, pp.
285–94.
-
Loomba, Ania & Orkin, Martin,
eds., Postcolonial
Shakespeares, 1998.
-
Macfarlane, Alan, Marriage and Love in England,
1300–1840, 1986, Ch.
7.
-
McAlindon, Tom, “The Discourse of
Prayer in The
Tempest”, in SEL
1500–1900 (41.2) 2001, pp.
335–355.
-
Mannoni, Oscar, Prospero and Caliban: The Psychology of
Colonization, trans. Pamela Powesland,
1956.
-
Miola, Robert S, Shakespeare’s Reading,
2000.
-
Neill, Michael, “Remembrance and
revenge: Hamlet, Macbeth and the
Tempest”, in Ian Donaldson, ed., Jonson and
Shakespeare, 1983.
-
Nevo, Ruth, Shakespeare’s Other language,
1987.
-
Nixon, Rob, “Caribbean and African
Appropiations of The Tempest”,
Critical Inquiry, 13 (1987),
557–78.
-
Nosworthy, J. M., “The narrative
sources for The Tempest”, Review
of English Studies, 24 (1948),
281–94.
-
Orgel, Stephen. The Illusion of Power: Political Theater in the English
Renaissance, 1975, pp.
45–9.
-
Pagden, Anthony, The Languages of Political Theory in
Early-Modern Europe, 1987, pp.
99–123.
-
Palfrey, Simon,
Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words,
1997.
-
Park, Katharine, “Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of
monsters in sixteenth and seventeenth-century France and
England. (1981), pp.
20–54.
-
Porter, Lauernce M., “Aime Césaire
reworking of Shakespeare: Colonialist Discourse in
Une Tempete; Comparative
Literature Studies, 32 (1995),
360–81.
-
Schmidgall, Gary, Shakespeare and the Courtly
Aesthetic, 1981.
-
Schmidgall, Gray, “The Tempest and
Primaelon: a new source”, S.Q., 37 (1986),
421–40.
-
Schmitt, Charles B. & Quentin
Skinner, ed., The Cambridge
History of Renaissance Philosophy, 1998, p.
155.
-
Schneider, Ben Ross, “Are we being
historical yet?”: Colonialist Interpretations of
Shakespeare’s Tempest”, S.
St., 23 (1995), 121–45; pp.
132–4.
-
Singh, Jyostna G., “Caliban Versus
Miranda: Race and gender conflicts in postcolonial
rewritings of The
Tempest”, in Valierie Traub et al., eds., Feminist Readings of Early Modern
Culture, 1996, pp.
191–209.
-
Sirgley, Michael, Images of Regeneration: A Study of
Shakespeare’s The Tempest in its Cultural
Backgrounds, 1985.
-
Sisson, C. J., “The Magic of Prospero”,
S. Sur., 11 (1958),
70–8.
-
Skura, Meredith Anne, “Discourse and
The Individual: The Case of Colonialism in “The Tempest”
in S.Q., Vol. 40, No.
1 (Spring, 1989), pp. 42–69.
-
Sokol, B. J. & Sokol, Mary, “The
Tempest and Legal Justification of Plantation in
Virginia”, ShakespeareYearbook, 7 (1996),
353–80.
-
Strier, Richard, “I am power”: “normal”
and magical politics in The
Tempest, in Derek Hirst and Richard Strier,
eds., Writing and Political
Engagement in Seventeenth-Century England,
2000, pp. 10–30.
-
Tomlinson, Gray, Music in Renaissance Magic,
1993.
-
Traub, Valerie. Feminist Readings of Early Modern Culture,
1996, pp. 201–2.
-
Vaughan, Alden T. “The Americanization
of Caliban”, in S.Q.,
Vol. 39, No. 2, (Summer, 1998), pp.
137–153.
-
Vaughan, Alden T. and Virginia Mason
Vaughan, Shakespeare’s Caliban:
A Cultural History,
1991.
-
Vaughan, Alden T. and Virginia Mason
Vaughan, eds. Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s “The
Tempest”,
1998.
-
Walker, D. P., Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to
Campanella, 2nd edn,
1975.
-
Walter, James, “From Tempest to
Epilogue: Augustine’s Allegory in Shakespeare’s Drama”,
PMLA, Vol. 98, No. 1
(Jan. 1983), pp. 60–76.
-
West, Robert H., Shakespeare and the Outer
Mystery. 1968, p. 84.
-
White, Marin, Renaissance Drama,
1998.
-
White, R. S., Let Wonder seem Familiar: Endings in Shakespeare’s
Romance Vision, 1985.
-
White, R. S. ed. The Tempest: William
Shakespeare. (New Casebooks.),
1999.
-
Whittkower, Rudolf, Allegory and the Migration of
Symbols, 1977, ch. 5.
-
Wilson-Okamura, David Scott, “Virgilian
Models of Clonization in Shakespeare’s Tempest”, in ELH 7, 60.3
(2003), pp. 709–737.
-
Wood, Nigel, ed. Theory in Practice: The
Tempest, 1995
-
Wootton, David, Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political
Writing in Sturat England, 1986.
