قراءات إضافية
المراجع
Silvia Ruffo Fiore, Niccolò Machiavelli: An
Annotated Bibliography of Modern Criticism
and Scholarship (New York, 1990) covers the previous half-century
of studies. For an analysis of my own approach see Roberta Talamo, ‘Quentin
Skinner interprete di Machiavelli’, Croce Via
3 (1997), pp. 80–101.
السيرة الذاتية
The standard work remains Roberto Ridolfi, The Life of Niccolò Machiavelli, trans. Cecil Grayson (1963).
Sebastian de Grazia, Machiavelli in Hell
(Princeton, 1989) is an unusual intellectual biography. John M. Najemy,
Between Friends: Discourses of Power and Desire in
the Machiavelli-Vettori Letters of 1513–1515 (Princeton, 1993)
concentrates on the period in which The
Prince was written. For the most up-to-date account see Maurizio
Viroli, Il sorriso de Niccolò: Storia di
Machiavelli (Rome, 1998).
السياق السياسي
For the period of Machiavelli’s youth see Nicolai Rubinstein,
The Government of Florence under the Medici
1434–1494 (Oxford, 1966). On the 1490s see Donald Weinstein,
Savonarola and Florence (Princeton,
1963). On Machiavelli’s political and diplomatic career see the section
‘Machiavelli and the Republican Experience’—essays by Nicolai Rubinstein, Elena
Fasano Guarini, Giovanni Silvano, Robert Black, and John M. Najemy—in Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Gisela Bock,
Quentin Skinner, and Maurizio Viroli (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 1–117. On the
vicissitudes of the Florentine republic during Machiavelli’s adult life see
Rudolf von Albertini, Firenze dalla repubblica al
principato (Turin, 1970), H. C. Butters, Governors and Government in Early Sixteenth-Century Florence,
1502–1519 (Oxford, 1985), and J. N. Stephens, The Fall of the Florentine Republic, 1512–1530
(Oxford, 1983).
السياق الفكري
The essays collected in P. O. Kristeller, Renaissance Thought, 2 vols (New York, 1961–65) remain
indispensable. For the fullest survey of the intellectual life of the period see
The Cambridge History of Renaissance
Philosophy, ed. Charles Schmitt, Eckhard Kessler, Quentin
Skinner, and Jill Kraye (Cambridge, 1988). For the classic account of ‘civic
humanism’ see Hans Baron, The Crisis of the Early
Italian Renaissance (revised edn, Princeton, 1966). See also
Donald J. Wilcox, The Development of Florentine Humanist
Historiography in the Fifteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1969)
and Peter Godman, From Poliziano to Machiavelli:
Florentine Humanism in the High Renaissance (Princeton, 1998).
For surveys of the political theory of the period see Quentin Skinner, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols
(Cambridge, 1978) and The Cambridge History of Political
Thought 1450–1700, ed. J. H. Burns and Mark Goldie (Cambridge,
1991).
دراسات عامة عن الفكر السياسي لمكيافيللي
The fullest outline is Gennaro Sasso, Niccolò
Machiavelli I. Il pensiero politico (Bologna, 1980). A classic
work is Felix Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini:
Politics and History in Sixteenth-Century Italy (revised edn, New
York, 1984). Mark Hulliung, Citizen
Machiavelli (Princeton, 1983) stresses Machiavelli’s subversion
of classical humanism. Leo Strauss, Thoughts on
Machiavelli (Glencoe, Ill., 1958) views him as ‘a teacher of
evil’. The place of religion in Machiavelli’s thought has been valuably
reappraised in a symposium—with contributions by John H. Geerken, Marcia
L. Colish, Cary J. Nederman, Benedetto Fontana, and John M. Najemy—in the
Journal of the History of Ideas 60
(1999), pp. 579–681. See also Anthony J. Parel, The
Machiavellian Cosmos (New Haven, 1992).
المفردات السياسية لمكيافيللي
J. H. Whitfield, ‘On Machiavelli’s Use of Ordini’ in Discourses on
Machiavelli (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 141–62. J. H. Hexter,
‘Il Principe and lo stato’ in The Vision of Politics on
the Eve of the Reformation (London, 1973), pp. 150–78. Russell
Price, ‘The Senses of Virtú in Machiavelli’
in European Studies Review 4 (1973), pp.
315–45. Russell Price, ‘The Theme of Gloria
in Machiavelli’ in Renaissance Quarterly 30
(1977), pp. 588–631. Victor A. Santi, La ‘Gloria’ nel
pensiero di Machiavelli (Ravenna, 1979). Quentin Skinner,
‘Machiavelli on the Maintenance of Liberty’ in Politics, 18 (1983), pp. 3–15. Hanna Fenichel Pitkin, Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of
Niccolò Machiavelli (Berkeley, Cal., 1984). Russell Price,
‘Self-Love, “Egoism” and Ambizione in
Machiavelli’s Thought’ in History of Political
Thought 9 (1988), pp. 237–61. Harvey C. Mansfield, Machiavelli’s Virtue (Chicago,
1996).
أسلوب مكيافيللي البلاغي
This has recently become a major focus of research. For pioneering
studies see Nancy S. Struever, The Language of History
in the Renaissance: Rhetoric and Historical Consciousness in Florentine
Humanism (Princeton, 1970) and Brian Richardson, ‘Notes on
Machiavelli’s Sources and his Treatment of the Rhetorical Tradition’, Italian Studies 26 (1971), pp. 24–48. The first
part of Victoria Kahn, Machiavellian Rhetoric from the
Counter-Reformation to Milton (Princeton, 1994) considers the
rhetoric of Machiavelli’s Prince and
Discourses. Quentin Skinner, ‘Thomas
Hobbes: Rhetoric and the Construction of Morality’ in Proceedings of the British Academy 76, pp. 1–61, highlights
Machiavelli’s use of rhetorical redescription. Virginia Cox, ‘Machiavelli and
the Rhetorica ad Herennium: Deliberative
Rhetoric in The Prince’ in Sixteenth Century Journal 28 (1997) connects
Machiavelli’s vocabulary directly to the Roman ars
rhetorica. Maurizio Viroli, Machiavelli (Oxford, 1998) lays particular emphasis on the
rhetorical character of Machiavelli’s thought.
دراسات عن كتاب «الأمير»
Hans Baron, ‘Machiavelli: The Republican Citizen and the Author of
The Prince’ in The English Historical Review 76 (1961), pp. 217–53. Felix
Gilbert, ‘The Humanist Concept of the Prince and The
Prince of Machiavelli’ in History: Choice
and Commitment (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), pp. 91–114. Marcia
Colish, ‘Cicero’s De Officiis and
Machiavelli’s Prince’ in Sixteenth Century Journal 9 (1978), pp. 81–94. J.
Jackson Barlow, ‘The Fox and the Lion: Machiavelli Replies to Cicero’ in
History of Political Thought 20 (1999),
pp. 627–45.
دراسات عن كتاب «المطارحات»
For a classic reading of the text and its context see J. G. A.
Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political
Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton, 1975),
Part II, ‘The Republic and its Fortune’, pp. 81–330. On the broader setting of
Machiavelli’s republicanism see Maurizio Viroli, From
Politics to Reason of State: The Acquisition and Transformation of the
Language of Politics, 1250–1600 (Cambridge, 1992). Harvey
Mansfield, Machiavelli’s New Modes and Orders
(Ithaca, 1979) offers a chapter-by-chapter commentary. More specialized studies
include Felix Gilbert, ‘The Composition and Structure of Machiavelli’s Discorsi’ in History:
Choice and Commitment, 1977, pp. 115–33; Felix Gilbert, ‘Bernardo
Rucellai and the Orti Oricellari: A Study on the Origin of Modern Political
Thought’ in History: Choice and Commitment,
1977, pp. 215–46; Quentin Skinner, ‘Machiavelli’s Discorsi and the Pre-humanist Origins of Republican Ideas’ in
Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock,
Skinner, and Viroli, pp. 121–41.
دراسات عن كتاب «تاريخ فلورنسا»
The fullest analysis is Gennaro Sasso, Niccolò Machiavelli II. La storiografia (Bologna, 1993). The
following detailed studies are of particular importance: Felix Gilbert,
‘Machiavelli’s Istorie Fiorentine: An Essay
in Interpretation’ in History: Choice and
Commitment, 1977, pp. 135–53; John M. Najemy ‘Arti and Ordini
in Machiavelli’s Istorie Fiorentine’ in
Essays Presented to Myron P. Gilmore ed.
Sergio Bertelli and Gloria Ramakus, 2 vols (Florence, 1978), pp. 161–91; Carlo
Dionisotti, ‘Machiavelli storico’ in Machiavellerie (Turin, 1980), pp. 365–409 and Gisela Bock,
‘Civil Discord in Machiavelli’s Istorie
Fiorentine’ in Machiavelli and
Republicanism, ed. Bock, Skinner and Viroli 1990, pp.
181–201.